RE: Your position on naturalism
November 23, 2016 at 7:08 pm
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2016 at 7:18 pm by Excited Penguin.)
(November 23, 2016 at 6:52 pm)Ignorant Wrote:(November 23, 2016 at 6:48 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: Why don't you tell me what your fucking point is instead?
A question is not a point.
When I asked you what your point was what I meant was 'why are you asking that question?' . You still haven't answered that. You want me to answer a stupid question, I won't. Why don't you just get to the point or, rather, tell me what you mean by the word nature in that instance, instead, if you so like. Be sure to tell me what relevance it has to our conversation as well, though.
Quote:You told me that words have meaning which can't be made up as we go along. Clearly you object to my understanding of "nature", and accuse me of equivocation. So I want to know what you mean when you say the word "nature" in reference to "human nature".
What I mean with making that objection is that you misunderstand what naturalism means, not what nature does.
You're not a naturalist. You believe in the supernatural. Or else you're not religious, not a Christian, and not a theist.
Any further questions?