(November 25, 2016 at 8:00 am)Little Rik Wrote: 1) All I did is putting examples where actions produce reactions....and called it karma. Version 1: karma is the immediate outcome of one's actions.
Quote:We already went through this argument before and guess what?Yes, I remember. You were shown numerous ways in which your claims were wrong and you clung to them. I won't re-hash that here because you're the one who brought up NDEs as being related to karma, which is nonsense. Your explanations remain wrong and therefore cannot be used to support an idea that would not work even if it was.
Quote:The reason why we have consciousness and subconsciousness is because consciousness is like the part of the iceberg above the water and subconsciousness is the part below.Look, you can't just make up unsubstantiated bullshit about how the subconscious works and then use that to defend an idiotic premise or idea. It doesn't prove your claims, it just makes you sound like an insane person.
Quote:If someone will carry out any wrongdoing then that person will incurred in bad karma for himself.Version 2: karma is NOT the immediate outcome of one's actions, it can build up like a points system which is cashed in by natural disasters.
Quote:Give me an example of your accusation so I can reply to you.See your two versions of karma above.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould