RE: An Inconvenient Question(s)
June 15, 2011 at 6:00 pm
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2011 at 3:45 pm by Atheist Jew.)
1. My "opinion" is backed by sources. Do us a favor and please, please, please ,with 72 "white raisins" on top, show us yours. I never said that Muhhamad wrote the Quran, I said that (alleged) sayings from him were included in it. That destroys that particular argument(i.e. Muhhamad is illiterate so he couldn't have written the Quran. The Arabs were in the area where the Torah and Bible were alleged to have been written, not to mention where quite a few Christians and Jews were living. So it is logical to assume that PARTS of both books got translated into Arabic, and found their way into the Quran. How else can you account for passages from the Torah and Bible being in the Quran. Besides, you are dodging the main question: Was the Quran cobbled together?
And Napoleon? Would you mind going on the thread and explaining your decision?
2. Have any of these "memorized copies" been written down, my derar friend? And I never said the ORIGINAL Quran, hmmm... you really are good at taking people out of context and interpreting their words past the brink of distortion, aren't you? I said that half of the (alleged) sayings of Muhhamad that were put forward to be in the Quran were rejected by the person in charge of determining what went into the Quran. And actually make a case on this thread instead of posting links to decadent replacements. Not to mention I was asking the questions so the burden of proof rests on you, not me.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Those threads you posted were utter rubbish. Once again, and listen carefully this time. I-ne-ver-sai-d-Muhh-am-ad-wr-o-te-the-Qur-an. See, that was easy, wasn't it? I can think of half a dozen reasons your argument is the sort of drivel I would accept from the usual delusional religious person. I will list three of them.
1. Your "opinion" does not matter unless you can find compelling reasons from the biographies and put them into a post on this thread instead of sending me several links to assorted sites.
2. Who judges the "Make A Literary Piece That Is Better Than The Quran" contest. I am sure that no famous authors bothered comparing their works to the Quran because it would get the Muslims angry and the fact that the contest is rigged.
3. You just said there was no evidence he was a prophet. Say, isn't the "Faith Time" show starting in a few minutes?
5. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Those threads you posted were utter rubbish. Once again, and listen carefully this time. I-ne-ver-sai-d-Muhh-am-ad-wr-o-te-the-Qur-an. See, that was easy, wasn't it? I can think of half a dozen reasons your argument is the sort of drivel I would accept from the usual delusional religious person. I will list three of them.
1. Your "opinion" does not matter unless you can find compelling reasons from the biographies and put them into a post on this thread instead of sending me several links to assorted sites.
2. Who judges the "Make A Literary Piece That Is Better Than The Quran" contest. I am sure that no famous authors bothered comparing their works to the Quran because it would get the Muslims angry and the fact that the contest is rigged.
3. You just said there was no evidence he was a prophet. Say, isn't the "Faith Time" show starting in a few minutes?
3. In Muslim countries there are far larger amounts of sexism and intolerance then other countries, as demonstrated by Minimalist's pictures. Of course there aren't any stonings for adultery and other crimes, intolerance for "brimstone spewing" blasphemists, and mutilation of people in Muslim countries(look at the Islamic fundamentalist group "Taliban", or Iran or Iraq, they are just "not interpreting the Quran correctly"). Let us just pretend all those people are extremists, and that the 9/11 bombers had many reasons for flying those people-filled planes into those people-filled towers.
4. Do any non-Muslim scholars, who do not have the underlying motive of making Islam look like a perfectly peaceful religion, and who have read the Quran in its entirety support this position? The terrorists still interpreted the Quran properly since you can make the case that the evil "Western Civilization" attacked the poor defenseless Muslims by invading their culture with pop/rock and roll/ metal/ emo/ rap music(I hate each and every genre I have mentioned) and other things. And also Iraq War, which was very beneficial for that swine, George W. Bush, not to mention his masters(Corporations, religious people, e.t.c). In fact, you could still carry out jihad/holy war 500 years later after an incident has occured, and still cite it as a valid motive. Just one of those great things about Islam I suppose.
And Napoleon? Would you mind going on the thread and explaining your decision?
2. Have any of these "memorized copies" been written down, my derar friend? And I never said the ORIGINAL Quran, hmmm... you really are good at taking people out of context and interpreting their words past the brink of distortion, aren't you? I said that half of the (alleged) sayings of Muhhamad that were put forward to be in the Quran were rejected by the person in charge of determining what went into the Quran. And actually make a case on this thread instead of posting links to decadent replacements. Not to mention I was asking the questions so the burden of proof rests on you, not me.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Those threads you posted were utter rubbish. Once again, and listen carefully this time. I-ne-ver-sai-d-Muhh-am-ad-wr-o-te-the-Qur-an. See, that was easy, wasn't it? I can think of half a dozen reasons your argument is the sort of drivel I would accept from the usual delusional religious person. I will list three of them.
1. Your "opinion" does not matter unless you can find compelling reasons from the biographies and put them into a post on this thread instead of sending me several links to assorted sites.
2. Who judges the "Make A Literary Piece That Is Better Than The Quran" contest. I am sure that no famous authors bothered comparing their works to the Quran because it would get the Muslims angry and the fact that the contest is rigged.
3. You just said there was no evidence he was a prophet. Say, isn't the "Faith Time" show starting in a few minutes?
5. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Those threads you posted were utter rubbish. Once again, and listen carefully this time. I-ne-ver-sai-d-Muhh-am-ad-wr-o-te-the-Qur-an. See, that was easy, wasn't it? I can think of half a dozen reasons your argument is the sort of drivel I would accept from the usual delusional religious person. I will list three of them.
1. Your "opinion" does not matter unless you can find compelling reasons from the biographies and put them into a post on this thread instead of sending me several links to assorted sites.
2. Who judges the "Make A Literary Piece That Is Better Than The Quran" contest. I am sure that no famous authors bothered comparing their works to the Quran because it would get the Muslims angry and the fact that the contest is rigged.
3. You just said there was no evidence he was a prophet. Say, isn't the "Faith Time" show starting in a few minutes?
3. In Muslim countries there are far larger amounts of sexism and intolerance then other countries, as demonstrated by Minimalist's pictures. Of course there aren't any stonings for adultery and other crimes, intolerance for "brimstone spewing" blasphemists, and mutilation of people in Muslim countries(look at the Islamic fundamentalist group "Taliban", or Iran or Iraq, they are just "not interpreting the Quran correctly"). Let us just pretend all those people are extremists, and that the 9/11 bombers had many reasons for flying those people-filled planes into those people-filled towers.
4. Do any non-Muslim scholars, who do not have the underlying motive of making Islam look like a perfectly peaceful religion, and who have read the Quran in its entirety support this position? The terrorists still interpreted the Quran properly since you can make the case that the evil "Western Civilization" attacked the poor defenseless Muslims by invading their culture with pop/rock and roll/ metal/ emo/ rap music(I hate each and every genre I have mentioned) and other things. And also Iraq War, which was very beneficial for that swine, George W. Bush, not to mention his masters(Corporations, religious people, e.t.c). In fact, you could still carry out jihad/holy war 500 years later after an incident has occured, and still cite it as a valid motive. Just one of those great things about Islam I suppose.
