(November 29, 2016 at 2:06 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(November 29, 2016 at 1:58 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote: Wow some of you guys are insane. You are not giving the case it's fair trial, why? The rabbit hole goes far deeper than the choice examples you've cherry picked out of an etire archive of shady e-mails and thorough investigation.
F Trump, F Hillary, i could give a shit. This is bigger than all that. But whatever. I just hope at least one person here will have the intergrity to investigate.
Bolded mine. What's bigger? There's nothing here, just ridiculous fever dreams of anti-Clinton fanatics and internet trolls. If this is such a huge story, then why don't you go out and do some investigatory journalism, unless you yourself lack the integrity that you accuse us of missing.
Or hey how about you take a look at the snopes I linked and let me know what you think of that, for a start.
I did, they didn't seriously adress any of the evidence. They reconised one picture, and dismissed the entire case! They rip the evidence out of context and ofcourse it's going to make it look radical. Then it goes on to explain it's orgions again not taking a seruous look at the evidence. Furthermore they quote an interview bewtween the shop owner claiming his innocince... Okay... Are you going to take his word for it like that? Is that we are all trained to do as intiliectual idividuals? NO. We INVESTIGATE, and come up with our own conclusions.
