Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 18, 2025, 7:58 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For Tackattack
#44
RE: For Tackattack
(June 16, 2011 at 8:30 am)colubridae Wrote:


1- I responded to your omnimax on page 2 which you said nothing about here .
2-Your reasons for your bigotry are irrelevant as
Quote:Bigotry
1. Obstinately convinced of the superiority or correctness of one's own opinions and prejudiced against those who hold different opinions.
2. Expressing or characterized by prejudice and intolerance.
Which you very readily admitted to. As well as these lofty (and most likely daft) promises of physical proof for the immaterial that you try and dangle like a carrot. Frankly I don't think anyone is interested. Those there who do believe don't need physical evidence and those who don't believe, probably will just laugh at your evidence.
3- Your opinion of me matters even less than care about your "evidence" and I'll answer your question only because it was directed to me, not to pander to your ego. I do not believe religion or morality should be taught in public schools. It should be reserved for Churches and homes. Private schools can do what the parents pay them for.
4-Omnimax is in the urban dictionary and there is a wiki entry for it. It's quite common and not nearly as "made up" as you want to make it out to be. As far as tautology, I only use the term omnipotent in a circle of believers or theologans. None of them believe that one word or concept could ever encompass God and realize it's a loosely defined shorthand for what we understand of God's power.

You have not made a case that any Christian, much less anyone you can find here, believes that God has the power to anything even the logically impossible.
You've made claims full of hot air and posturing.. although your apology seemed sincere enough on paper

Now if that's it then I'm done. Now if anyone else would like to open up the discussion to the contradictory omnimax principles state your case.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply



Messages In This Thread
For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 15, 2011 at 10:05 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Tiberius - June 15, 2011 at 12:41 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 15, 2011 at 1:05 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Tiberius - June 15, 2011 at 1:16 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by lilphil1989 - June 15, 2011 at 1:17 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 15, 2011 at 2:40 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Violet - June 15, 2011 at 1:09 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Shell B - June 15, 2011 at 2:48 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 15, 2011 at 3:11 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Shell B - June 15, 2011 at 3:21 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 15, 2011 at 3:38 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Shell B - June 15, 2011 at 3:39 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 15, 2011 at 3:46 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by leo-rcc - June 16, 2011 at 5:17 am
RE: For Tackattack - by lilphil1989 - June 15, 2011 at 4:50 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 15, 2011 at 6:12 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by eric209 - June 15, 2011 at 6:31 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by frankiej - June 15, 2011 at 7:41 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by tackattack - June 16, 2011 at 4:11 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 5:30 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Faith No More - June 16, 2011 at 5:39 am
RE: For Tackattack - by lilphil1989 - June 16, 2011 at 8:41 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 8:44 am
RE: For Tackattack - by lilphil1989 - June 16, 2011 at 9:00 am
RE: For Tackattack - by leo-rcc - June 16, 2011 at 9:03 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 10:26 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Darth - June 16, 2011 at 11:08 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 11:20 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Darth - June 16, 2011 at 11:25 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Faith No More - June 16, 2011 at 2:44 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Darth - June 16, 2011 at 2:52 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by frankiej - June 16, 2011 at 2:54 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Faith No More - June 16, 2011 at 2:57 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 5:33 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by leo-rcc - June 16, 2011 at 5:33 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 5:35 am
RE: For Tackattack - by LastPoet - June 16, 2011 at 6:07 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 7:06 am
RE: For Tackattack - by tackattack - June 16, 2011 at 7:25 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 8:30 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Darth - June 16, 2011 at 9:22 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 16, 2011 at 2:28 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Tiberius - June 16, 2011 at 3:47 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by tackattack - June 17, 2011 at 1:17 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 17, 2011 at 6:38 am
RE: For Tackattack - by tackattack - June 18, 2011 at 3:13 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Darth - June 17, 2011 at 2:41 am
RE: For Tackattack - by lilphil1989 - June 17, 2011 at 3:58 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Violet - June 17, 2011 at 4:18 am
RE: For Tackattack - by bozo - June 17, 2011 at 2:47 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by Darth - June 17, 2011 at 5:05 am
RE: For Tackattack - by Violet - June 17, 2011 at 1:13 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by tackattack - June 17, 2011 at 5:52 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 17, 2011 at 8:00 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 20, 2011 at 4:33 pm
RE: For Tackattack - by tackattack - June 21, 2011 at 4:37 am
RE: For Tackattack - by colubridae - June 21, 2011 at 11:31 am



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)