RE: An Inconvenient Question(s)
June 18, 2011 at 7:15 am
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2011 at 7:50 am by Atheist Jew.)
Successfully answered means correctly answered, Napoleon
Also, here is said story, now completed:
To even begin to imagine the argument occuring here, imagine there are three people talking to one another:
P1: What is one plus one?
P2: It's four, and besides, you said it was six!
P1: No, I didn't. Any how, one plus one equals two because one represents one unit, and two of them equal two units, which represent two.
P2: You just said one plus one equals seven! It is four! And I have proof of it!
P1: I never said it was seven. I said it was two. Anyhow, where is your evidence?
P2: You just said it was eight! Well, four is four and that is that since these books at the library say so! (Scribbles down call numbers). And here are more books
P1: I never said this was eight(Looks at library books)...HAHAHAHA! These books are rubbish because I never said four does not equal four. I said one plus one equals two.
P2: No, you said the answer was nine, since you said you never said it was six, seven, or eight so you said it was nine. And here are more books.
P1: Listen, let us pretend this argument existed because it is impossible to argue with you. And please don't just give me the call numbers of books.
P2: Hahahahaha!!! I wiiiiin!!! Yay! Since you said to pretend you never said it was ten, its obvious you can't defend your position, hahahaha! And here are more books.
P1: I have sources: Basic Mathematics and several online sites.
P2: Hahahaha, you told me not to just post the call numbers of books but you just did it. Hypocrite, hypocrite, yay, yay, yay.
P1: But I only did it once while you did it several times
(At this point the third person enters the conversation)
P3: I have listened to five seconds of this debate, only listening to 1 second of the question. And I think the question is stupid, stupid, stupid! And I couldn't listen to P1's words cuz' big bad smartypants arguments hurt my brain! Anyhow, P2 answered the questions perfectly, pal!
P1: Please stop insulting me.
Also, here is said story, now completed:
To even begin to imagine the argument occuring here, imagine there are three people talking to one another:
P1: What is one plus one?
P2: It's four, and besides, you said it was six!
P1: No, I didn't. Any how, one plus one equals two because one represents one unit, and two of them equal two units, which represent two.
P2: You just said one plus one equals seven! It is four! And I have proof of it!
P1: I never said it was seven. I said it was two. Anyhow, where is your evidence?
P2: You just said it was eight! Well, four is four and that is that since these books at the library say so! (Scribbles down call numbers). And here are more books
P1: I never said this was eight(Looks at library books)...HAHAHAHA! These books are rubbish because I never said four does not equal four. I said one plus one equals two.
P2: No, you said the answer was nine, since you said you never said it was six, seven, or eight so you said it was nine. And here are more books.
P1: Listen, let us pretend this argument existed because it is impossible to argue with you. And please don't just give me the call numbers of books.
P2: Hahahahaha!!! I wiiiiin!!! Yay! Since you said to pretend you never said it was ten, its obvious you can't defend your position, hahahaha! And here are more books.
P1: I have sources: Basic Mathematics and several online sites.
P2: Hahahaha, you told me not to just post the call numbers of books but you just did it. Hypocrite, hypocrite, yay, yay, yay.
P1: But I only did it once while you did it several times
(At this point the third person enters the conversation)
P3: I have listened to five seconds of this debate, only listening to 1 second of the question. And I think the question is stupid, stupid, stupid! And I couldn't listen to P1's words cuz' big bad smartypants arguments hurt my brain! Anyhow, P2 answered the questions perfectly, pal!
P1: Please stop insulting me.
