Is atheism a scientific perspective?

[Jesster]

No, atheism is not related to science. Atheism is simply a rejection of a claim. Atheism also is unrelated to evolution, so you attacking that scientific fact isn't going to accomplish a damn thing.

Also, no, we don't have to fill in the gap to reject your claim. Asking us "well what else caused all this then?" does not require us to answer a damn thing in order to not accept your bullshit. If you want us to believe a damn thing you do, then come here with the evidence to back that up.

All I was trying to say was that intelligence is the only known cause capable of producing specified/sequential information. Someone said that was wrong, so I asked them if they know of another cause. I'm not saying that because we don't know how it was done we appeal to God, I'm saying that because we know intelligence is capable, then it is not irrational to conclude that it played a role. 

What would you consider evidence of design?

You brought a claim first. Asking for another one does not improve yours one bit. If someone does not believe you, it is on you to back it up. It's not on them to prove you wrong.

What would I consider evidence of design? How about you start with any evidence and we'll work from there.

All this from someone who is trying to talk about science... right.