Karma poll

[Angrboda]

More like 100% bollocks.  All you are doing is asserting your conclusion that consciousness cannot be a product of the brain.  That's not providing evidence to the contrary, that's just begging the question.  And now you've doubled down on this stupidity.  Way to go, airhead.


You were asked to provide evidence that consciousness is not a product of the brain.  Neither of these has anything to do with that proposition.  You can claim that there is a special nature to consciousness such that it requires a different sort of expert until you're blue in the face, that's not providing evidence that it is special in the way you claim.  You're just making bare assertions like usual.

FOOL.  

Boo! Back atcha, dumbass.

There is plenty of evidence that from nothing you get nothing and that from the small you get the small not the big.

What fucking evidence are you talking about? From small parts we get large trucks, large ships, huge skyscrapers. From small humans choosing to live
near each other develop huge cities. So where's the evidence that from the small you only get the small? There is none, because this is just another
"law" that you pulled whole hog from your ass, and it's demonstrably false.

You guys always praise science but science tell you that you are dead wrong.  
Have you ever seen a car that create a driver?
Science tell us that is the human being that create the car.

What the fuck are you babbling about? Have you ever seen a human as big as a car? Small from small my ass.

How can something physical-material as the brain can create something bigger and abstract as the consciousness?

What have you been smoking? Consciousness is neither bigger nor smaller than the brain; it has no dimensions. And what, besides your prior assumption that the concrete can't give birth to the abstract makes you think the concrete can't serve as host for the abstract. The filing system on your computer is an abstract entity, but it sure as hell has a physical incarnation in the wiring of the computer. This is another "law" that you pulled from your ass and it depends on the brain not giving rise to consciousness, because then it would assuredly be false. So your "law" depends on the belief you have about consciousness being true in order to validate it. That's begging the question plain and simple.

Did anybody ever told you what the word ABSTRACT means yog?
And did anybody ever told you what is the difference between material and abstract?

Do you ever do anything but pull things from your ass and quote non-existent "laws" ? The material and the abstract collide at multiple points, including consciousness.

Oh, sorry you are atheist.
Now is all clear.
I never thought of that yog.  

There's a whole metric shit ton of stuff you never thought of, all because you're stuck in the dogma of beliefs you cribbed from Sarkar and Ananda Marga.