RE: Is atheism a scientific perspective?
December 27, 2016 at 12:59 pm
(This post was last modified: December 27, 2016 at 1:01 pm by AAA.)
(December 27, 2016 at 6:27 am)robvalue Wrote: That's seems to be a common theme.
I get the feeling some people come here so they can "beat" atheists, to validate their beliefs.
I think the OP subject here has been played out. I object just as much to attempts to attach atheism to other positions. It's a very simple stance on a single question, and nothing more.
I don't come here to beat atheists. I come in hopes that a few (not you, you're too proud) will realize that their lack of belief in a designer is not the scientific fact that they think it is. Moreover, if they spread their atheistic worldview in the name of science, then they spread ignorance and corrupt science by convincing others that empirical science has something to say about the presence of life.
(December 27, 2016 at 12:57 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Actually it's more robust that you are willing to accept. Sure as hell beats your position of "therefore magic".
Nobody said magic. Why is design magic in your mind? Did it take magic to design your car? Also it isn't that robust. What makes it robust in your eyes?