(December 30, 2016 at 1:02 am)Orochi Wrote:(December 29, 2016 at 11:38 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Or, because it's just a movie and no one really gives a damn about relativity, the conservation laws and/or the work-energy theorem. I have to give the script writers and producers credit, though, with respect to the last film and the star-sucking planet, which I didn't really understand and/or realize until I got home later in the evening after seeing it. The intense, fantastic speech by the Imperial officer was too much of a distraction to the inevitable physics contemplation that would take place later on. I can excuse FTL travel, but not the abrogation of universal gravitation.
no really that's the reason the novel states the empire found the shield tech they did make it that's why they can't reproduce it your question was about why the deathstar doesn't have the shield that's why
as for star killer base keber crystal ancient sith tech pretty much covers this
Hee, hee...the work-energy theorem still applies:
And, so, no star-sucking planets, but hey, it's just a movie/novel! Don't forget that a "cloaking device" was mentioned very briefly in Star Wars: A New Hope!