Is atheism a scientific perspective?

[robvalue]

Science is essentially about learning something. We gather information, we hypothesise, we test, we improve, and ultimately we seek to show we've understood how something works.

ID doesn't do any of this. It doesn't demonstrate that we've learned anything at all. It has no way of showing it. There are no mechanisms. No models. No predictions. No results. No tests. It's not science. It's pseudo-science, which it will always be, because it's bullshit.

Either you care about the scientific method, or you don't. And if you don't, you've got a hell of a case to make as to why anyone should take you seriously.