RE: Jesus did not rise from the dead -- My debate opening statement.
January 3, 2017 at 4:43 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2017 at 4:44 pm by Crossless2.0.)
(January 3, 2017 at 3:28 pm)21stCenturyIconoclas Wrote:
Minimalist
The problem with ancient historical documents is that they tend to tell us far more about the times in which they were written than they do about the times they are supposed to be talking about.
So while any document is a "historical document" what it tells us is what later xtians in divergent sects tended to believe at the time they were written. They don't need a "historical" jesus for that.
Minimalist,
Huh? Pseudo-christians don't have to prove an historical Jesus that was Yahweh incarnate, or the son of Yahweh, which is the crown jewel and the impetus of their primitive Bronze and Iron Age cultist belief??????? Surely you jest?
I can understand why pseudo-christians try in vain to be insidiously anachronistic, but to give them a pass upon not proving their serial killing Jesus existed is blasphemy! LOL
m
m
Wow. Just wow.
You might want to spend a bit of time here before saying stupid shit like, ". . . but to give them a pass . . . ." to Minimalist, of all people. Min doesn't give passes. Ever.
The mere thought of Min giving Christians a pass is so fucking wrong you're in danger of ripping the very fabric of space/time with it.
