Cheers guys 
I do use a lot of guesswork, (which is why I 'guess' religion isn't for me as a whole). I do like to look into it all though in an academic sense. I did start trying to read the bible but it was the 'begat' section which 'begot' me, (I mean seriously, there's so many pages and pages of names that it becomes like reading an ancient telephone directory). It is interesting to examine the metaphysical nature of the work though, (such as the 'Arcana Celestia'), as I feel there's a lot to learn from such texts without the artifice of religion coming in and polluting it.
Whilst it's also true that not all religions are organised I 'guess' I prescribe myself to the ideas not beliefs angle as ideas are interchangeable in regards to myself, (being the solipist that I am).
And yeah, Patton Oswalt is cool, (being a great example for us Brits that Americans do have a good sense of humour)
I do use a lot of guesswork, (which is why I 'guess' religion isn't for me as a whole). I do like to look into it all though in an academic sense. I did start trying to read the bible but it was the 'begat' section which 'begot' me, (I mean seriously, there's so many pages and pages of names that it becomes like reading an ancient telephone directory). It is interesting to examine the metaphysical nature of the work though, (such as the 'Arcana Celestia'), as I feel there's a lot to learn from such texts without the artifice of religion coming in and polluting it.
Whilst it's also true that not all religions are organised I 'guess' I prescribe myself to the ideas not beliefs angle as ideas are interchangeable in regards to myself, (being the solipist that I am).
And yeah, Patton Oswalt is cool, (being a great example for us Brits that Americans do have a good sense of humour)
