Tooth Fairy Bullshit

[Huggy Bear]

In order for a supernatural causation to be considered, supernatural has to be proved to be a thing.
We know that things occur by natural processes, so this would be the most, and at this stage, only logical possible solution.
My beliefs are based on what can be proven, your faith is despite what can be proven.
Get the difference.

*emphasis mine*



Belief and faith are synonymous, there is no difference...

belief

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/belief


1. something believed; an opinion or conviction: a belief that the earth is flat.

2. confidence in the truth or existence of something not immediately susceptible to rigorous proof: a statement unworthy of belief.

3. confidence; faith; trust: a child's belief in his parents.

4. a religious tenet or tenets; religious creed or faith:  

---

Then we should be able to detect those interactions at the very least.

We do, just not by scientists.

I posted evidence of those interactions on multiple occasions, and interestingly enough it gets quiet as a mouse up in here...

---

No I used the word RELATIVE dummy not RELATIVITY, which simply means 'in relation to something else', I'm not talking about the damn theory.  

Time being relative is the Theory of Relativity, you fucking simpleton.  But, hey, continue to insult people because you're talking about things of which you're obviously clueless.  It's not like you'll surprise us and show that you actually have an ounce of shame.

And once again, Huggy avoids the actual point being discussed because he's clearly wrong in order to focus on an irrelevant detail.  It's okay, Hugster.  We've come to expect nothing less from you.

Ok then, if simply stating that time can be different in relation to point of view is the Theory of relativity, then you admit that the Bible introduced relativity first

Oh, gee, a guy who is championed by Deepak Chopra. Excuse me if I'm unimpressed.

Also, it appears this guy spends a lot of time talking about the evolution of consciousness and evolutionary psychology. So, I guess you're just picking and choosing what this guy believes in. If it supports what you believe, he's right. If it doesn't support what you believe, he's wrong. Is it too much to ask for some intellectual integrity from you? Oh, wait, what am I saying...

I take it that's a "no" on the brain fillet?

Funny quick you guys are to discredit someone's work based on nothing...