RE: Human Devolution
January 20, 2017 at 8:01 pm
(This post was last modified: January 20, 2017 at 8:02 pm by I_am_not_mafia.)
(January 20, 2017 at 7:08 pm)Pulse Wrote:(January 20, 2017 at 6:17 pm)Mathilda Wrote: I notice that you have not contested the idea that the idea of irreducible complexity completely ignores the fact that systems develop and change over time.
As I said, I can evolve many different systems that cease to function if you take away one component.
Again Let's look at the ATP Sythese enzyme which is a marvel of Engineering and had to have each of its component parts work from THE BEGINNING, to work properly, any part missing makes it useless. How could it possibly gradually evolve?? Not to mention myriads of other nano machines in the cell, that's what Behe was referring to, not bridges or ecosystems. I am concerned you put too blind much faith in GA.
A quick google search would have given you the answers. There's even a section on wikipedia about how ATP evolved
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATP_syntha...P_synthase
Quote:The evolution of ATP synthase is thought to be an example of modular evolution during which two functionally independent subunits became associated and gained new functionality.
