Prayer ... SERIOUSLY?!

[DaveD]

Well you just asserting that they are of course does not make it so. How am I supposed to correct the problem if you won't point out where and how I commit it? I guess I will just carry on as usual

lol - you and I both know you would've anyway.

I don't remember which forum it was, but I've seen the same nonsense from Statler Waldorf before, so you're conclusion would seem to be accurate.

---

The age of the earth is a scientific question. Scientific questions are never answered by a simple appeal to majority or consensus. If that were the case Science would never progress because new ideas would be shot down immediately.

Scientists wouldn't get away with such a popularity contest as there are always other scientists waiting in the wings to rip their ideas to shreds. When such attempts fail, only then is a consensus reached.
In contrast, creationists are always falling over themselves agreeing a consensus first (so long as it accords with their reading of their book of fables), then looking for ways to twist or invent evidence to support their conclusion.