RE: I Find It Offensive; How About You
June 28, 2011 at 7:37 pm
(This post was last modified: June 28, 2011 at 7:44 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(June 27, 2011 at 10:42 pm)FaithNoMore Wrote:
Hey FNM,
You have to remember that you are a bit of an exception to the rule. You have actively arrived at a conclusion based on what you perceive as what the evidence supports. This is more of the traditional and classical definition of an atheist, one who affirms the non existence of God. I was referring to these new atheists who assert that atheism is more of just an absence of belief in God and it should be the default position that everyone takes, so the onus is really on anyone else asserting otherwise. I don't feel you fall into that category at all my friend.

(June 28, 2011 at 1:23 am)Anymouse Wrote:
I disagree James. I think the original definition of atheism as being a positive belief in the non-existence of God or gods is a better definition. I do not believe the dog turd lying on the sidewalk, the dead man in a casket, and my little finger are all atheists even though they too lack a belief in God or gods. Atheism is a position; therefore the onus is on both atheists and theists.
As to pointing to people claiming to be Christians doing bad things, surely you would agree that this in no way proves Christianity is false right?