Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 16, 2025, 8:57 pm
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Skepticism & Pseudoscience v
Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
Paraselene Offline Donators
Previous username: Silver
Faith's Nightmare
*****
Religious Views: Infidel Savant
Posts: 34719
Threads: 1436
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation: 152
#26
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?
February 1, 2017 at 1:58 am
(May 27, 2016 at 8:40 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?

Never.
"What a little moonlight can do." ~ Billie Holiday
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Skepticism & Pseudoscience v
Can a lack of evidence be considered proof?

Messages In This Thread
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Paraselene - February 1, 2017 at 1:58 am
RE: Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? - by Asmodee - February 1, 2017 at 11:39 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof) insider432 277 153869 August 22, 2014 at 1:10 pm
Last Post: pgrimes15



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)