Guys.....isn't this going a bit too far?

[FatAndFaithless]

@FAF,

So let's get this straight.
You're saying a human baby doesn't have the right to use a woman's body against her will.

1) You're wrong because the baby didn't ask to be made. It was put there by a joint effort from a man and a woman.

Analogically speaking, no restaurant has a right to put their food in your mouth. Let's say you go to have dinner out and eat their food. According to you, you should be able to sue them when you no longer want their food inside you.

The problem with your argument is that you're removing any sort of accountability from two people and trying to somehow pin everything on a baby which didn't ask to be made in the first place.

2) Even if you were right it still doesn't justify the killing. It's like inviting your neighbours over and blasting a shotgun in their face for trespassing your property.

Your analogies are sloppy and not at all relevant to my point, namely that the 'decision' of the fetus is utterly unrelated to my position.  The fact that you think my position justifies 'killing' is another mark of your misunderstanding (possibly willful).  

I've had the abortion debate countless times on this forum with people that are far more amenable to actual, reasonable conversation than you, and those were productive discussions.  I think I'm done with this one though, I'm not in the mood to wade through a pool of flat talking points, again.