Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
RE: Integration is not the Opposite of Segregation
February 10, 2017 at 6:47 pm
(February 10, 2017 at 2:27 pm)Khemikal Wrote:
(February 10, 2017 at 12:54 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: As you said integration doesn’t equal incoming cash flow. And as I said integration is not preclusive of segregation (when a community is controlled by those outside that community).
It's difficult for me to understand this line of thinking, as segregation is the setting apart of a group - my local community is controlled, at least insomuch as you seem to be speaking of control, by those outside our community. I don't, personally, consider this segregation. I don't consider my community to be segregated for having fit such a definition. It's certainly not segregated in any sense that wouldn't generate a chuckle from people who did have to live with segregation.
Quote:You’ve pointed out some things that all communities share in common, i.e., the financial abandonment of the local entrepreneur. I see this happening across the board, so I can’t disagree with you there.
I used to live in Los Angeles where the Koreans were the only people selling black hair products. Why was this the case? Why were black businesses trying to sell me $300 African dresses but never things I would buy?
You'd have to ask them. Chances are....because it was profitable to do so, same reason that anyone overcharges anyone else and nothing to do with integration whatsoever. Probably not much to do with the korean war either. So what did you do, when black businesses didn't have what you wanted to buy? Did you take your money elsewhere? Maybe start up your own business?
Quote:Irish and Italian gangs violently wrested policy (playing the numbers) away from blacks, shooting up establishments so that customers were afraid to go there. Calling this a self-inflicted wound is like calling the brutalization of the Freedom Riders by the KKK a self-inflicted wound.
I'm pointing out that lotteries, legal or...in this case illegal...-are- a self inflicted wound to the poor who predominantly play them. That the people who run them are ruthless thugs doesn't change the fact that the people who get conned are harming themselves and their communities of their own accord. "They stole our illegal enterprises" is...iffy, imo, as a comment on anything we're discussing and just iffy in and of itself. Criminal rackets aren't the Freedom Riders...and irish and italian organized crime winning out over black organized crime isn't the KKK..the comparison is absurd.
There was an effort to get people to stop playing the numbers altogether, I assume? How did that go?
Quote:I do not, by any means, think that all blacks’ problems can be laid at the feet of other ethnic groups, or that blacks are always the innocent victims in their encounters with others. I do think that we are in a cycle where everybody plays a part and few are willing to take responsibility for the part they play.
Sure, but I'm not making any remarks on such sweeping generalities...I'm simply pointing out what I see as misattribution with regards to your specific examples. I do not see how integration forced or compelled blacks to shop "elsewhere", or play the lottery. It seems, to me, like you're talking about a range of other things not specifically related to integration, or even a failure of integration.
I assume that, as we continue to discuss those things you saw as contributing to the demise of the black community, I'll better understand what you mean by this and by your novel use of terms such as segregation and integration.
Yes, some of what I said was in answer to your questions and not specifically about integration. Hopefully, we can get on the same page with this. I appreciate your investment of time and energy and will do my best to be clearer.
I don’t use the conventional meanings of integration and segregation because they just deal with numbers without touching the social and political realities. The majority of whites live in all white neighborhoods and only encounter other ethnic groups on the job or on TV. Yet, they don’t themselves segregated. Absent is the caged in and controlled feeling one gets when one is truly segregated.
What I’m going to have to say is that it wasn’t integration but the black response to integration that caused the black community to collapse.
It’s true, as you said, that integration opened a lot of opportunities for blacks, but it also weakened their incentive to invest in their community. This, of course, was their fault and short sightedness.
There are examples of other groups who used integration to help their communities. The Japanese, for example. After Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they sent their children to America to learn everything we knew about technology. They took that knowledge back to Japan and now japan is a leader in technology. The Mexicans come here to work and send the money back to Mexico. Of course, many things going back to slavery contributed to the shame and aversion blacks feel toward their own. But they still have the power to do things differently.
One note on playing the numbers. The money was used to fund black businesses and when it was taken over, that capital dried up making it impossible for black businesses to compete yes, it was illegal, but it was all they had.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.