(February 18, 2017 at 1:00 pm)Jehanne Wrote: But, they would be pointing it at a moving target that is going at 675 times the speed of sound, and then, they would also have to track that target across intergalactic space. In addition, the radio signal, even if it was a laser, could end-up being scattered away by the zillions upon zillions of atoms, molecules, dust particles, etc., scattered throughout intergalactic space. In addition, the energy requirements, given the inverse law, would still be enormous, likely, the entire energy output of the US over the course of a year, assuming, that ET wanted their signal to picked-up by something other than the Arecibo telescope, which means, of course, that Arecibo would need to be looking at the right spot at the exact time.Details. Details.
P.S. Arecibo is not equipped to pick-up laser light.
It's one thing to say something couldn't possibly exist. But to say something couldn't possibly be done is to cut off the future before we get to it.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.