LHC disproves ghosts

[Huggy Bear]

I think the scripture was pretty clear, 1 day to God is 1000 years in relation to man, which means time is relative...

Are you being deliberately dense?
Or deliberately.... what was the word I used before?... disingenuous?

How is that disingenuous? By definition either that scripture is describing the relativity of time or it isn't, which is it?

If they are able to produce fertile offspring then by definition they are the same species.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/species

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_41

Brilliant misuse of the resources available to you and a complete misunderstanding of what I meant!

Fruit flies are widely used in genetics experiments, because there is a particular species of fruit flies with a very well detailed genome, a species that has been bred and bred and bred and cloned and cloned.... and they always start with flies that have that very well known genome.
They then let them evolve under different conditions... these are the experiments.
At some point, after many generations of experimentation, the resulting fruit flies are no longer the species that they started off from. They can't interbreed. Not the same species.
That's what I said, go back and read it again.
There are various species of fruit flies in the wild.... and scientists have generated a few more in the lab.

I see google is not unknown to you, so I'm sure you can find these results on your own.

*emphasis mine*
Then you misunderstood what I asked you. I asked you to provide an example of completely separate species producing fertile offspring.

What you need to do is provide an example is of completely separate species producing fertile offspring.

If you're stating that different species cannot interbreed, then you agree with what I said.

Because there can only be one possibility and I choose to believe what the bible says about it. Your position is also know as confusion.

In quantum physics, they call it a superposition of states.
Many possibilities, no way to find out which is actually true, so we don't pick one... we let them all stir in the pot.

Again, why do you choose to believe what the bible says about it?
Why, out of the myriad possibilities, do you choose to accept that one particular as the only one representative of reality?

Because it's a personal conviction, I've seen enough evidence to have no doubts about what I believe, and frankly that's all that matters.

How can a spirit agree with reality if it's not part of it?

Come on, Huggy... you're always going on about how you're misrepresented... try to read what people write, too!
The question was about the "definition of a spirit" or "description of a spirit".
Try again... please don't be lazy.

Your question was

So, whatever the definition of a spirit is, do you think it agrees with the reality that you see around you?

If I define a spirit as being incorporeal, then it does not agree with reality. I posted a video I thought gave a reasonable explanation.



 

In the example Carl Sagan gives "up" does not exist in a 2 dimensional world, therefore a 3 dimensional entity does not agree with that reality.

I notice you didn't answer my question...

Your question was irrelevant to the matter at hand, wasn't it?
The Absence of time I was talking about is not the same as whatever time passes as things travel through the Universe's space-time.

Humor me.