(March 7, 2017 at 9:24 am)Drich Wrote:(March 3, 2017 at 2:00 pm)TheAtheologian Wrote: That is the big problem. It is equivalent to the "invisible dragon in my garage" problem. You point out that God only speaks to those that accept his existence, no logic or reasoning to provide, which means you can't expect a critical thinker to accept it (at least on that way of looking at it).That's not true either. Most Like me have quite a miraculous interactions between ourselves and God. Now understand these interactions are not to convince others, as they are directed at a specific individual Spiritual needs. however these interactions are indeed evidence that God is willing to interact with anyone who simply follows His instructions. Unlike you failed dragon analogy God does indeed evidence one in the way of testimony so the God claim is not just being announced from a complete void/dark, and more importantly the claims (for the last 2000 years) are being supported to individuals by God Himself. Otherwise why follow a given religion if it does not deliver what it promises.
Again, same problem. Every religion claims to be directed towards spiritual needs. They all claim that they have interactions with deities (worship). None of it is evidence of the truth of it. If you expect a person to accept a religion, there must be rational grounds for accepting it.
Hail Satan!