RE: Heated debate on evolution with brother
March 21, 2017 at 5:24 am
(This post was last modified: March 21, 2017 at 5:28 am by Pat Mustard.)
(March 20, 2017 at 6:23 am)mikesmilestoday Wrote: You lose.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I lose what, your respect? Ain't worth shit child.
Your subjective jugdementvof who's correct? Well your subjective judgement goes against conclusive evidence so you're wong, child.
(March 20, 2017 at 7:20 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:(March 20, 2017 at 6:04 am)mikesmilestoday Wrote: It appears that somebody, either him or you has been sold some bad information. You, of course, instantly assume that it is him who is wrong even though he is near genius in so many areas.
Look closely at what you are assuming is true, find a few good examples, and then ask him what his thoughts are about those. Like, find a couple of fossil examples of one species evolving into a different species. He has already admitted that micro evolution is real, so don't bother with changes within the same species, find some inter species changes to discuss with him.
At all costs, stay away from the name calling or you will have instantly lost any argument.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Snowtracks "near genius", something does not smell right here.
Yeah, one of my first thoughts on reading mikes miles first post was, "this is awful sockpuppety behaviour".
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home
