so-called "moon landing" question

[Minimalist]

http://www.def-logic.com/articles/lunarlanding.html

The speed of the falling dust in the Lunar video clips actually gives us reason to believe that the footage must have been taken on the moon. We know that dust can't fall at that rate on Earth because of the atmosphere. And even if the engineers of a Lunar hoax managed to created a vacuum in a studio, we would expect the dust to fall much faster than it did in the actual footage. Dust in a vacuum falls as fast as a brick.

So, the movement of dust in the Lunar footage can't be used to support the conspiracy theorist's claims. If the conspiracy theorist continues to assert that the footage is fraudulent, the following question arises: If the footage is fraudulent, how could the special effects producers of the 1960's create footage of dust falling to the ground in a vacuum slower than it would on Earth? The burden is on the conspiracy theorist to answer this question.

It is the last line which is telling in all of this. The nutters never answer questions. They merely insist that the official story is wrong and let their paranoia do the rest. The 9-11 crowd is even worse than the moon landing nuts when it comes to this.