(July 14, 2011 at 3:29 am)Chuck Wrote: They can not be the something since each implies a capacity to place an constraint on the other when the other by definition must be unconstrained in that respect.
1. For a being to be able to do everything, he must be able to alter what he has already known would happen, thus doing everything must include negating omniscience.
You might be onto something here, but it's still a bit vague to me, can you expand on this?
Quote:2. Knowing is a thing that can be done, but so is unknowing. If you can do everything, you must be able to also deprive yourself of your own omniscience.
This one seems perfectly legit, good point.
.
