RE: US may launch strike if North Korea moves to test nuclear weapon
April 16, 2017 at 2:40 pm
(This post was last modified: April 16, 2017 at 2:49 pm by dyresand.)
(April 15, 2017 at 3:00 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote:(April 15, 2017 at 2:22 pm)dyresand Wrote: In all honestly the democratic party chose to lose they could have pushed anyone else and won
but they chose Clinton and people don't really like the Clinton's that much. Granted she won the popular
vote and it does show that we do need electoral reform and need to get rid of the electoral college and base
our votes on popular vote instead of the stock 2 party system.
Well, popular vote might sound good, but when a majority of the population looks at facebook as a trustworthy news outlet, a popular vote only system is just another brexit waiting to happen
Do you honestly blame people for liking news on Facebook more than corporate media on TV honestly.
Trust in the media is at an all time low it's also funny when you look at actual reporters and actual news being told over youtube
lately youtube and the corporate media has been cracking down on them and demonetizing their videos. If i were to make a video
on Syria or anything having to do with the middle east id lose my partnership along with ad revenue. Granted facebook as of a day before yesterday
said how to spot fake news it can be taken as either good or bad thing. But any case we do need electoral reform there is going to be fake news
regardless i mean my favorite fake news site is the onion.
(April 16, 2017 at 12:46 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote:(April 15, 2017 at 2:22 pm)dyresand Wrote: In all honestly the democratic party chose to lose they could have pushed anyone else and won
Every time somebody comes up with this idiocy, I'll keep pushing the fact that the Republitraitors removed by illegal means 10,000,000 voters from the lists. Clinton won the vote by 3.5million votes, how many more would she have won if everybody could vote (like they do in a democracy). And then you've got the gerrymandering and the votes not counted in the rustbelt and Florida. An independent and thorough count of the vote (even without the citizens deprived of their rights) would have seen Clinton with 400+ Electoral College votes.
You want to change the system? Agitate for the removal of all political party oversight of US elections, local, state and national. Don't piss and moan at the party most willing to play fair.
We do need serious electoral reform that's all i'm really trying to say. in this current system
you don't really have vote at all because only electoral votes really matter. All i am saying is
we should have a system to where one vote really means one vote and that vote holds weight.
if people had the choice of oh i want to vote for this asshole ill vote for this asshole instead of hey
here is a ballot with 4 choices instead you have multiple choices rather than, do you want to vote for
republican, democrat, green, libertarian, because those were the choices i seen when i voted. All im saying is
have the option instead of throwing 2 major parties in peoples faces and let them have a real choice for once
is what im saying.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>