RE: Subjective Morals and Societal Whims
May 15, 2017 at 7:36 pm
(This post was last modified: May 15, 2017 at 7:39 pm by Simon Moon.)
(May 15, 2017 at 6:55 pm)InteresedUser Wrote:(May 15, 2017 at 1:26 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Interesting that you should pick on paedophila, as that is one thing that the bible does not seem to be specifically against and indeed actively promotes it in several passages, Mohammed of islam seems fond of the young ones as well.
Yes, Muhammad was a pedophile and so are atheists. Atheists are pedophiles because we observe in nature societies that practice this and criminals against society do it. They think they are right. There is only the natural explanation in atheistic naturalism. But who is to say it is bad since it is simply part of nature. Whereas in Christianity it is bad each and every time under any circumstances. Objective truth supersedes your changing feelings why this week you think pedophilia is good or bad.
"Despise not one of these little ones" (Matt. 18.10).
"Without natural affection" (Rom. 1.31).
"Lovers of their own selves, covetous" (2 Tim. 3.2).
"Lusts of the flesh" (Gal. 5.16).
"Fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness" (Gal. 5.19).
Uh...
Mary was 14, possibly younger, when she gave birth to Jesus, according to the myth.
According to ancient Jewish custom and practice, Mary could have been betrothed at about 12.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.