Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 22, 2024, 11:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hemant Mehta
#33
RE: Hemant Mehta
(June 11, 2017 at 1:18 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: erm...evolution is a directionless process.  'Devolution' is a nonsense word.  If humans began to get hairier, walked more stooped over, developed smaller brain cases, and in other ways became more ape-like, it would still be properly called 'evolution'.

Boru

No, Bor.
Devolution is not a nonsense word.
It is just the opposite of evolution.
Not according physical science but according the reality of going forward or going backward.

The job of physical scientists so far has been to see a change over time.
They call this change evolution but they wouldn't know who goes forward and who goes backwards.
They can not see within each and every creature.
They can not know who gain and who lose.
They don't know which animal become a human being and which human being goes back to become an animal.
For them every change is evolution but this is incorrect.


DEVOLUTION
ˌ
formal
descent to a lower or worse state.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=devol...e&ie=UTF-8



I guess you never thought about that Bor, did you? [Image: idea_guy.jpg]






(color mine)

(June 11, 2017 at 1:09 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(June 9, 2017 at 10:34 am)Little Rik Wrote: Now you reach the limit of dishonesty Yog.
In the previous post I point out to you your failing in saying that intuitional science and Hinduism go hand in hand when in fact they don't.
Instead of admitting your failing you instead change subject thinking that I don't notice that.

Right.  I changed the subject by repeating my words.  That's a neat trick I've got there.  Either that or you're a liar.


You are an absolute joke and a real nut case Yog.
It didn't take me long to discover that.  Wink


(June 9, 2017 at 10:34 am)Little Rik Wrote: Now you come down with more garbage which of course lack of any evidence.
Where is the evidence that Sarkar .........repackage a bunch of Indian myth and lore?
Come up with evidence or go back to sleep.

Quote:On the one hand you say that Sarkar's teachings have a seven thousand year pedigree, on the other hand you deny that Sarkar is just repackaging
ancient shit.  You're talking out of both sides of your mouth.  You can't have it both ways.  The truth is that Sarkar was repackaging ancient shit,
and that ancient shit is worthless legend and myth.  You've claimed that intuitional science leads to knowledge, but you've produced nothing but
rehashed ancient bullshit.  That's because the bullshit is a lie.

Wikipedia says, "Sarkar's system of spiritual practice has been described as a practical synthesis of Vedic and Tantric philosophies."  
And the definition of a synthesis is, "combination or composition, in particular; the combination of ideas to form a theory or system."
So Sarkar's system is a combination of Vedic and Tantric philosophies.  Old shit that never led anybody to any enlightenment.
Sarkar was just repeating old crap that he had learned from books, legends, and shit.  Nothing new.  So you can take your
memes and colorful font enabled chants of "fool" and shove them up your patootie, along with your worthless yoga.
Name one thing that you learned from "intuitional science" alone.


The more you try to get out the mental quick sands the more you sink in.
You just make so much confusion that you are now totally lost.
You say......All that Sarkar did was repackage a bunch of Indian myth and lore.......

Let us see what the word repackage means.
It means......package again or differently or present in a new way.

That never happen Yog.
Shiva was teaching the same meditation that Sarkar was teaching and what his teachers are now teaching.
And so the tandava dance and so the moral code of conduct.
What Sarkar was teaching also was Prout and microvita.
These things Shiva was not teaching for obvious reasons.
In those times there was no need for these teaching as in those times people had different problems.

Now let us see your demented idea that Sarkar repackage-d...... a bunch of Indian myth and lore....

Myth are stories that may or may not carry any truth.
I did asked you to provide evidence about these so called myth but I am still waiting for your reply.
The day you will produce this evidence that Sarkar was going around telling stories void of truth then
we can discuss this.

In the meantime better you go back to sleep considering your total mental confusion.  Dizzy
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Hemant Mehta - by Mrs.B - May 31, 2017 at 3:49 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by ignoramus - May 31, 2017 at 5:42 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - May 31, 2017 at 5:59 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by brewer - June 1, 2017 at 6:25 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by LadyForCamus - June 3, 2017 at 11:03 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by ignoramus - May 31, 2017 at 6:07 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - May 31, 2017 at 6:26 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by chimp3 - May 31, 2017 at 6:27 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 3, 2017 at 10:59 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by chimp3 - June 4, 2017 at 7:21 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by downbeatplumb - June 4, 2017 at 7:39 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 4, 2017 at 8:22 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by chimp3 - June 4, 2017 at 8:26 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Harry Nevis - May 31, 2017 at 10:19 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by TheoneandonlytrueGod - June 1, 2017 at 6:20 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Pat Mustard - June 5, 2017 at 4:07 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by LastPoet - June 3, 2017 at 11:03 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 3, 2017 at 11:24 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Angrboda - June 4, 2017 at 9:05 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 4, 2017 at 9:35 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Whateverist - June 5, 2017 at 5:46 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 5, 2017 at 10:28 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Whateverist - June 5, 2017 at 11:52 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 6, 2017 at 9:54 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Whateverist - June 6, 2017 at 11:14 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Angrboda - June 6, 2017 at 2:35 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 8, 2017 at 10:11 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Whateverist - June 8, 2017 at 3:45 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 9, 2017 at 10:34 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Angrboda - June 11, 2017 at 1:09 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Angrboda - June 8, 2017 at 10:19 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - June 11, 2017 at 1:18 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 12, 2017 at 8:06 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Whateverist - June 14, 2017 at 9:44 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by emjay - June 14, 2017 at 5:18 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 14, 2017 at 8:06 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by emjay - June 14, 2017 at 3:00 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by The Grand Nudger - June 14, 2017 at 9:26 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 14, 2017 at 10:33 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by The Grand Nudger - June 14, 2017 at 2:10 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by The Grand Nudger - June 15, 2017 at 2:13 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 15, 2017 at 9:10 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by emjay - June 15, 2017 at 11:42 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 16, 2017 at 10:54 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by emjay - June 16, 2017 at 11:45 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 17, 2017 at 8:45 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by The Grand Nudger - June 15, 2017 at 10:46 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Hammok Man - June 15, 2017 at 6:34 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by The Grand Nudger - June 16, 2017 at 5:36 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Hammok Man - June 16, 2017 at 9:13 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Whateverist - June 16, 2017 at 10:31 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by The Grand Nudger - June 16, 2017 at 3:56 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Whateverist - June 16, 2017 at 8:05 pm
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Little Rik - June 17, 2017 at 4:16 am
RE: Hemant Mehta - by Hammok Man - June 16, 2017 at 4:29 pm



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)