(June 11, 2017 at 10:14 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:(June 11, 2017 at 9:46 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I got the ban hammer dropped at me once because I showed an assortment of nude images, including some of naked children playing on the beach. In this case, there was a 100% disconnect between my views of what is sexual or dirty, and those of others-- so much of a disconnect that the mods (and others) literally couldn't understand how I couldn't realize that those pictures of kids were dirty, sexual, inappropriate images; and that I couldn't understand how THEY could possibly view children, in any context at all, as sexual objects. They felt disturbed by my view, and I felt disturbed by theirs.
Your repeated mischaracterization of that incident is curious, seeing as we have explained multiple times why we temp banned you.
We did not view the picture of the naked child as sexual. We viewed it as someone else's child that you hotlinked and posted a picture of---without that child's permission or the permission of the parents. We have a blanket rule that no pictures of naked children will be posted on this site, period. Rather than parse which children gave permission for their naked bodies to be displayed for a bunch of internet strangers, we decided to err on the side of caution. I understand that you don't agree with this rule. But don't try to make it out like we think children are always sexual objects.
You're a god damned adult. Act like one.
^^^this