Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 23, 2024, 2:51 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eeeenglish
#22
RE: Eeeenglish
(June 20, 2017 at 8:46 am)Khemikal Wrote:
(June 20, 2017 at 2:02 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: People are people; humans.
Having a good structured values in the head, would allow for better societies, and even better countries.
Not really descriptive of the ottoman empire.  They didn't have any of those good structured values, or a better society, or a better country. They had a massive imperial state supported in labor and administratively by a slave caste drawn from european conquest. The actual history of the ottoman empire, apart from your ideas of a glory age..was so shitty, so repressive, so stagnant, that the modern descendants of those people broke entirely with that history. 

The Ottomans weren't perfect, let alone their values being a mixture of Sufia Islam -which is quite Sunna-, Turkish local customs which was pretty close to Arabian harsh customs and some right pieces here and there from the Quran.

It was a fact that they enslaved people, tortured their enemies and went on conquests on an imperialistic scale; but they didn't massacre Christians in Constantinople like Crusaders did in Jerusalem, they had a very active market that involved all nationalities and religions. Even if I was an atheist in that time, I would pick them over Cont Dracula in Europe.

The Hadith -in my humble perspective- brought their empire down. The crimes of the Pashas were influenced by twisted, racist decaying customs, that found haven in the Hadith books. If they followed the Quran purely; they wouldn't have constructed Harems, took European boys to form the Jenesarie, and wouldn't push forward their disgusting Turkish nationality over people who aren't even Turks.

But it's an empire; what did it do outside the definition of an empire?

In terms of religion; I think they didn't or weren't following the Quran alone anyways.

Quote:
Quote:All the Qurans out there are the same since a very, very long time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birmingham...manuscript
Some are plain, like my bible, and others are beautifully decorated.   I prefer the gold leaf and calligraphy to pictures of jesus with a dinosaur.  

The words are what matters after all; not pictures.


Quote:
Quote:If the Quran and the Hadith were mixed together; then we have the same scenario of the Bible.
It's independent though; from Saudi Arabia to Israel.
We have the same scenario of the bible with just the koran.  An obvious work of fiction taken by a great many to be both divine and incapable of being mistaken.  

No; while you have whole chapters and books attributed to "Saint Paul" and others.
So you can literally say: "Paul narrated Jesus:....."

And there you go; a Christian Hadith.

Quote:
Quote:It's not at all; actually it differs a lot from Judaism; unless you used the Hadith.
Oh stop, you simpleton, lol.  If you want to throw around nutter shit about this or that sect being a perversion of this or that faith, it doesn't do you or islam any service to bury your head in the sand over it's own pedigree, and it's own perversions.  

Simpleton!!! that's a new word. Just translated it Smile
I'm not burying my head; but declare my own innocence from such ideas.

In other words; my personal constitution is written in 600 pages; it's called the Quran. A Shiite burning a Sunni here; or a Sunni blowing a Church there; or a Christian throwing napalm at Muslims; is none of my responsibility. My constitution explicitly criminalize these people and their faiths..The impales of the Ottomans are counted with the crimes; too.


Quote:
Quote:For example; stoning people for sex. 
Judaism allow it.
The Islamic Hadith allows it
The Quran doesn't even mention such penalty
Nothing you can tell a girl with two black eyes that she hasn't already been told twice.  

Gotta remind; though. It's the truth

Quote:
Quote:Racism against black people in Arabia dates back to days before Mohammed himself; more than...1400 years?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarah_ibn_Shaddad
https://muftah.org/the-children-of-antar...Ui5ueuGPIU

Arabs picked up on this poet for being black
Okay.  

Quote:
Quote:You have a point..
French is taught a lot there; and considered "Classy" to speak in some french words.
Hehe, same here.  OFC, it's considered "classy" to speak in full english sentences as well, but I digress.  

No no; French is honestly a very romantic language when it's spoken by girls. 
Take the word "Pa'afa"=Perfume

Quote:
Quote:He's talented ! dope
You sure they didn't go nuts over his talent?  Plenty of white rappers who didn't make it.   How bout LIL D, they all about LIL D...or is he too jewish? : snickers :
[/quote]

Many don't even understand what he says; guys from Palistine and Jordan were lighter in skin so they would wear stuff like bandanas, and give you the "AAAh ya zalamee; slim sheedy".. 

IT'S SHADY. NOT "SHEEDY". But you can't correct, or it's the OP allover then.

vorlon13

Huh?? White penis is red; not white !

mh.brewer

Cricket?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 18, 2017 at 12:03 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by Minimalist - June 18, 2017 at 1:33 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by Anomalocaris - June 18, 2017 at 8:41 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 18, 2017 at 11:28 pm
RE: Eeeenglish - by The Grand Nudger - June 18, 2017 at 1:42 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by bennyboy - June 21, 2017 at 7:32 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by ignoramus - June 18, 2017 at 1:46 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by Anon2381 - June 18, 2017 at 1:51 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by downbeatplumb - June 18, 2017 at 8:29 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by J a c k - June 18, 2017 at 11:28 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by The Grand Nudger - June 19, 2017 at 7:24 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 20, 2017 at 12:32 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by The Valkyrie - June 20, 2017 at 12:36 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 20, 2017 at 12:58 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by ignoramus - June 20, 2017 at 1:02 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 20, 2017 at 2:02 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by The Grand Nudger - June 20, 2017 at 1:08 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by pocaracas - June 20, 2017 at 6:12 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by The Grand Nudger - June 20, 2017 at 8:46 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 22, 2017 at 12:29 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by vorlon13 - June 21, 2017 at 11:13 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by brewer - June 21, 2017 at 4:29 pm
RE: Eeeenglish - by Losty - June 22, 2017 at 2:57 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 22, 2017 at 3:41 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by Losty - June 22, 2017 at 3:46 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 22, 2017 at 4:10 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by Losty - June 22, 2017 at 4:13 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 22, 2017 at 4:43 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by ignoramus - June 22, 2017 at 4:42 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by Losty - June 22, 2017 at 5:00 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by ignoramus - June 22, 2017 at 4:45 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by Jesster - June 22, 2017 at 5:26 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by The Grand Nudger - June 22, 2017 at 7:47 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by WinterHold - June 22, 2017 at 3:46 pm
RE: Eeeenglish - by Losty - June 22, 2017 at 7:51 am
RE: Eeeenglish - by The Grand Nudger - June 22, 2017 at 4:11 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)