(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: You want the sources themselves?
pfft... obviously, the wiki page of those authors. It has the sources from where whoever wrote the wiki got their info.
I felt it was way too much work to provide every single link.
The source below wasn't from the wiki, so I provided a proper one.
I always give links and references therefore, it is my right to ask for every single link so I can check the text from where you have extracted your quotes.
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Damn! So you're telling me that the same Nazi propagandist spoke ill of the jew who showed that he was just spreading propaganda?!
WOW! Shocking!
For the sake of argument, I say your statement is correct. However, in the list that I offered 99% books are not written by Nazi Propagandists. They were not even Germans. All those books talk more or less similar things what J. Keller and Hanns Andersen have written in “The Jew as Criminal.” And, beware I have not given you the complete list.
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Well... boohooo
http://www.chabad.org/news/photo_cdo/aid...enorah.htm
https://www.tedeytan.com/2015/12/11/19391
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/meno...ival-hope/
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news...180961553/
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: How could I expect you to know how to use google?
Here, I'll help with the first one:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=As+a+public+intelle...e+reported
Thank you for providing that amazing tutorial. Regrettably I am not in need of that tutorial, simply past the links from where you have taken your quotes. That is much simpler than searching for fantastic tutorials.
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: absconding?
"verb 1. (intransitive) to run away secretly, esp from an open institution or to avoid prosecution or punishment"
My reasoning skills must be failing me.... how does that apply to what I said?!
Prove that Quran contains corruption and discrepancies or simply admit you cannot take the challenge. There is a third option “absconding” which seemingly you have chosen for you.
You should not have any problem in accepting this challenge because internet is full of anti-Islam websites which are providing abundant proofs showing Quran has plenty of discrepancies. Simply select couple of those proofs, copy, and paste.
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: I can assure you that I am no Jew. It says so right there: "non-believer".
As for the crypto thing.... I have no idea what you mean.
I'm writing to you in comprehensible English, I think.... no cryptography is being employed, beyond the site-wide SSL encryption which your browser decodes without any input from you or me.
By nature, Jew cannot be anything else. If he hides his identity and become a crypto-Jew, that is a different story.
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: awww... so nice... all these people know me so well, by now... I'm touched!
Also, from what I know about them, none of them are Jews.
Self-contradictory BLAH!
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Have you seen the Zeitgeist video? beautiful thing.... full of juicy information of things that happened in alleged secret meetings.... how did the guys in the video gain access to that secret info?
Peter Joseph is one of the best contemporary thinker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn32YAidHx0
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Damn those Jews.... they're the ones mimicking my stuff!
Why don't you stop embarrassing yourself with this xenophobic behavior?
Jews are humans. We are humans. What separates Jews from other humans is their religion.
Any behavior not attributable to the Jewish religion is not a monopoly of the Jews.
How do you like to hear that you are behaving like a Nazi? Like a racist? Like a xenophobe?
If you know your Jewish history then you must be aware what your Talmud is teaching. This is your Talmud that makes you (the followers of Talmud) deceivers.
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: I'm sure you're trying to insult someone with that.... but failing miserably...
"Cuck may refer to:
Cuckold, the husband of an adulterous wife
Cuckquean, the feminine version of a cuckold
Cucking stool, a chair that was used as punishment in Great Britain
Cuckoo, a family of birds
Cuckservative, a political neologism and term of abuse
Commercial Utility Cargo Vehicle, or CUCV
Cucq, a community in far northern France
CUCC, a common abbreviation used by several Cambridge University clubs
Which of these are you trying to apply there?
Cuckservative
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: It was all going so well.... right up until that last sentence...
The one accused of fabricating his "facts" is a "respectable moral citizen"?
I know! Pointing to Jewish frauds is a SIN according to Talmud.
(June 21, 2017 at 12:06 pm)pocaracas Wrote: "Muslims hate non-Muslims regardless whether they are honest peaceful people and living with high morals or not."
HEY, what do you know.... it works! Did you see what I did? I just replaced a word! It still works!!
Let me try it again!
"Nazis hate non-Nazis regardless whether they are honest peaceful people and living with high morals or not."
It worked again!!!
Try to test your word game with this stuff:
If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.
Talmud. (1935). Baba Mezia. Soncino Edition. 114a-114b.
What a Jew obtains by theft from a Cuthean [Gentile] he may keep.
Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 57a. p.388.
[Gentiles] are outside the protection of the law and God has ‘exposed their money to Israel.’
Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition. 37b.
Jews may use lies (‘subterfuges’) to circumvent a [Gentile].
Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition. p.664-665.
A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by coition (sexual intercourse).
(Sanhedrin 55b and 69a-69b) and (Yebamoth 57b 58a, 60b)
Talmud. (1936). Yebamoth. Soncino Edition
A heathen [Gentile] who pries into the Torah [and other Jewish Scriptures] is condemned to death, for it is written, it is our inheritance, not theirs.
Talmud, Sanhedrin 59a. (1935). Soncino Edition. p.400.
(June 21, 2017 at 3:45 pm)alpha male Wrote: Harris hasn't been banned because...?
“Harris has not been banned because” banning Harris would expose THEIR Jewish Identities.
(June 21, 2017 at 7:18 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I believe that the level of vehemence Harris directs toward the Jews constitutes hate speech, and if he were ever actually to DO anything beyond posting here, his internet history would point in a glaring way toward this site. Given his obvious intelligence and obvious delusion (at least from our perspective), I don't think this is a trivial possibility tbh.
That being said, I think Harris' posts are a rare and important chance for us to get insight into how a certain category of person thinks, right or wrong, and I'm not too worried about the legalities or moral issues. My main problem is that he keeps shitting on the Philosophy section with decidedly unphilosphical bullshit-- I wish he'd be told to keep his efforts contained in other sections, where inappropriate content is more acceptable.
I am eager to have Philosophical discussions. All my articles are philosophical specially:
The Problem of Evil in atheism and in Islam
Proof of God
Natural Order and Science
knowledge & belief in God
Origin of evil
Hatred
Media
The problem which I am facing at Atheist Forum is responses to my philosophical articles are not philosophical. On top of that you are expecting philosophical responses from me to your non-philosophical replies.
(June 22, 2017 at 6:09 am)Alex K Wrote: Harris, I got to ask. What is your opinion on the alleged Lizard people invasion? True or false?
Jews always kept themselves alienated while living among different ethnicities. In that sense, they are literal aliens among normal human beings. It is also a fact that they have invaded Americas, most part of Europe, and many other parts of the world. Some people think they are Parasites other think they are creepy reptiles. If some people think they are Lizard people then I am sure they have reasons for that. It is up to you what you want to call them. If you want to know my personal views then I am with those who consider them as parasites.