(July 23, 2011 at 6:21 pm)edk141 Wrote: Rewind to the bit where "faith goes beyond reason". You lost me there. Are you saying that although reason doesn't support faith it doesn't go against it either, or are you saying your faith is supported by reason?
Quote:What you have empirical evidence for, you don't need reason for.Could you rephrase that for my benefit? I really don't understand what you're trying to say at all
Now you have the choice to abandon reason, or join the thinking. Which will it be?
I think he means that if you have empirical evidence for something you don't need [to apply] reason to explain the same something. If my interpretation of his words is correct how would you arrive at the empirical evidence if you didn't apply reason?
Quote:Now you have the choice to abandon reason, or join the thinking. Which will it be?
The only way I can interpret this sentence is that he's giving me the choice between abandoning reason or joining the thinking which can only mean that in his opinion the thinking don't reason.