RE: Hello
July 24, 2011 at 4:03 am
(This post was last modified: July 24, 2011 at 4:07 am by fr0d0.)
(July 23, 2011 at 6:21 pm)edk141 Wrote: Rewind to the bit where "faith goes beyond reason". You lost me there. Are you saying that although reason doesn't support faith it doesn't go against it either, or are you saying your faith is supported by reason?I did't say that. Weakling did. Faith is pure reason, as proved in the statement about faith provided.
(July 23, 2011 at 6:21 pm)edk141 Wrote:Sure. Empirical evidence is the record of one's direct observations or experiences. I don't need to reason that a chair I see in front of me exists. I can see and feel it.Quote:What you have empirical evidence for, you don't need reason for.Could you rephrase that for my benefit? I really don't understand what you're trying to say at all
Now you have the choice to abandon reason, or join the thinking. Which will it be?
Belief in God, conversely, is an entirely cerebral exercise. You can have no empirical evidence for him.
(July 24, 2011 at 2:20 am)weakagnostic Wrote: The only way I can interpret this sentence is that he's giving me the choice between abandoning reason or joining the thinking which can only mean that in his opinion the thinking don't reason.Well you seem to be demonstrating an inability to reason weakling.
Abandon reason (don't think) or join the thinking (do think)