(May 6, 2009 at 3:35 am)Darwinian Wrote: Now, the question is, is my Dual core 2.7 faster than the Quad core 2.2? And if so, why bother with a Quad?
I have to concede I get very confused by this as well.
According to CPU performance charts (here's the Passmark one) dual core tends to be much less powerful than core 2 duo (dual core is not the same as core 2 duo) and quad core (I think they call it core 2 quad) is faster still. The problem with quad core is that there's nothing much that uses it ... as I understand it, if you use it with 32 bit Windows it won't even see 2 of the cores so that wastes your money and even if it did there are few applications that are quad core aware.
The advice I usually get is buy dual core until the OS landscape changes ... alternatively you can use Linux which I believe is fully able to use those kind of CPUs but Adrian and a couple of others would be better advisers on that than me.
Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!
Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator