RE: "Cultural Appropriation"
June 27, 2017 at 2:38 pm
(This post was last modified: June 27, 2017 at 2:39 pm by paulpablo.)
(June 27, 2017 at 2:33 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(June 27, 2017 at 2:27 pm)paulpablo Wrote: A person from one culture using a headdress from another culture coincides perfectly with the text book definition of cultural apropriation.
Copyright infringement and earning money from stealing doesn't.
Also from what I can tell the people who wrote the songs for elvis, both black and white, were credited and payed for doing it.
No, it doesn't...and I'm tired of explaining to the usual suspects why no amount of claiming that it does and talking about silly shit is even remotely addressing the reality of cultural appropriation.
Well, as long as elvis's people payed one or two darkies, we're cool, right? Everyone's off the hook, then and now.
It does.
Cultural apropriation is the use or adaption of elements of a culture by people of another culture.
If a headdress is an element of someone's culture it's textbook cultural apropriation for someone of another culture to use that headdress or adapt into their own style.
And yes as long as the people, darkies or whiteys, agreed to sell their songs and got paid and credited then we are very cool.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.