(July 6, 2017 at 11:04 am)TheBeardedDude Wrote:(July 6, 2017 at 10:46 am)SteveII Wrote: To answer your question, I spotted the problem in your reasoning and questioned you on it. I have your answers and you are unwilling or unable to go deeper into the topic--so, that is probably it.
You spotted what you thought is a problem and don't like the answers I have given in response. You want to obfuscate and present theological special pleading while constructing straw men from my replies. This is very disingenuous, and your answers to my questions appear to be too.
No, that is not the case. No offence, but I can't discuss anything with someone who hides behind a misuse of "special pleading" at every turn.
For example, in response to my post https://atheistforums.org/post-1580092.html#pid1580092 (which took me awhile to write), your responses amounted to "special pleading", "straw man" and restating there is no evidence/magic isn't real. You did not address specifics in any way. That tells me you are either unwilling or unable to discuss the issues on a deeper level--which is fine. I will move on.