RE: The Origin of the Universe
May 7, 2009 at 5:19 am
(This post was last modified: May 7, 2009 at 5:20 am by lilphil1989.)
(May 6, 2009 at 7:43 pm)WebChris Wrote: Warning: Your statement is riding on “Abiogenesis” (life from inanimate matter). It launches out like a floating brick and has sunk into bottomless “guessed probability” and its cousin certain impossibility. Let me suggest this design; your very own basic "self replicating molecule" with a shape that represents an obvious symbol of a very large and worldwide belief system; when stretched out, of course. > the Laminin Molecule< : just google it and let me know what you think.
hmm, so still no actual responses?
As for laminin, firstly, it is not self-replicating.
second, Let's assume for a minute that your god did create humanity and decided to put a very vaguely cross-shaped molecule in our organ membranes.
Why cross-shaped? At this point your man hadnt been nailed to everyones favourite plank, and the cross wouldnt mean anything.
Of course you could say that your god knew it would happen in the future, but since he was (supposedly) nailed there by humans, that kinda pisses all over the idea that your god gave humans free will...
Finally, explain to me how this is any different to me claiming that the vaguely spaghetti shaped villi in my gut are proof that we were created by the flying spaghetti monster.
.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
