And, to mention, also, Craig rejects Lorentzian invariance, and postulates that there is, somewhere in the physical Universe (not just "heaven"), an absolute frame of reference. Of course, Craig has no evidence whatsoever of such a place. Now, if Craig rejects Lorentzian invariance, then he needs to reject the BGV theorem, which assumes such.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 27, 2025, 2:58 am
Thread Rating:
|
Why William Lane Craig is a dope.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| More nonsense from William Craig... | Jehanne | 34 | 4938 |
July 3, 2016 at 11:52 pm Last Post: robvalue |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
