Am I nuts? I like Jesus..:)

[drfuzzy]

That ain't what your fucking godboy said....allegedly.

JC TRASHED the harshness of the Old T by superimposing an enlightened approach on it,  and people quicky cottoned on..-

"Jesus saved you from the empty way of life handed you by your forefathers" (1 Peter 1:18 )

"In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent." (Acts 17:30)

"Jesus is worthy of more honour than Moses" (Heb 3:3)

"The covenant of which Jesus is mediator is superior to the old one" (Heb 8:6)

"Through Jesus we are saved,and not through Moses" (Acts 13:39)

So let's see, Jesus is supposed to be Yahweh, because he's a part of the Trinity, and Yahweh is supposed to be unchanging and unchangeable.  If you deny the relevance of the OT, you are actually saying that Yahweh is not your god.  If you are saying that Yahweh IS the same god, then you imply that Yahweh had a plan, and knew he was going to screw up and change his mind many, many times, and wipe out humanity because he screwed up, then rewrite the whole mess by requiring himself to sacrifice himself to himself to cover up his monumental screwups.  If Yahweh had a plan, then he should have perfected it instead of screwing up so much that he'd have to try to cover up his mess with . . . his own blood, because he loves blood and needs to take lives, just like the old bronze age war demon that he actually is.  What you're saying is that Jesus was sent to re-write the whole message . . . the war demon needed a spin master.  He was too nasty.

And now we also know that there was no "first human couple", no Adam, no Eve.  No Garden of Eden, and no apple.  No original sin.  So, no need for a blood sacrifice.  I guess your old bronze age war demon wanted one anyway, huh?