(July 24, 2017 at 8:27 am)Brian37 Wrote:(July 23, 2017 at 12:12 pm)Epiphany Wrote: A fatherless child is possible, but there's a big problem with the New Testament's rendition: such a child is always female.
Not in primates. That old mythology back when it was written intended you to believe that there was no fucking going on. There is no story about a female stealing ejaculate from a male and secretly shoving in her vagina in the Bible. Back then that would have been the only way to fool the public into thinking you were a virgin.
In the human species it requires TWO sets of DNA, and back then they did not have the modern C section surgery so the baby was born through the birth canal.
I don't know what you mean by "fatherless child", outside marriage, but as far as evolutionary biology in humans, it takes TWO sets of DNA. And back then the idiots who wrote that book had no clue how the human body male or female worked. They literally believed back then that girls could magically pop out a kid with no help.
Well, the mother could theoretically clone herself via parthenogenesis like other animals do.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
