(July 24, 2017 at 8:36 am)Alex K Wrote:(July 24, 2017 at 8:27 am)Brian37 Wrote: Not in primates. That old mythology back when it was written intended you to believe that there was no fucking going on. There is no story about a female stealing ejaculate from a male and secretly shoving in her vagina in the Bible. Back then that would have been the only way to fool the public into thinking you were a virgin.
In the human species it requires TWO sets of DNA, and back then they did not have the modern C section surgery so the baby was born through the birth canal.
I don't know what you mean by "fatherless child", outside marriage, but as far as evolutionary biology in humans, it takes TWO sets of DNA. And back then the idiots who wrote that book had no clue how the human body male or female worked. They literally believed back then that girls could magically pop out a kid with no help.
Well, the mother could theoretically clone herself via parthenogenesis like other animals do.
The human species DNA sequence never made that possible in our species, we are not talking about other species. Nor did they have cloning technology back then nor does the bible mention modern cloning. I am quite sure even in surrounding and prior polytheism, considering that men considered periods dirty I am sure some females would steal male ejaculate and put it in their vagina to get pregnant then lie and say they did not have penal/vaginal penetration.
Don't feed the fundies. The idea of female purity at the time of marriage was common in all of antiquity. Again, even the mythology of the first Buddha had his birth avoiding the birth canal.
