RE: Plagiarism in the NT
July 24, 2017 at 11:42 pm
(This post was last modified: July 24, 2017 at 11:53 pm by RoadRunner79.)
What evidence? What do you consider to be an objective historian? What is the basis of their reasoning? Are you shifting the burden of proof already?
Actually wasn't even going to post, until you called me out and started speaking for me. But you probably won't believe me, no matter what I say. You'll just make up a story, declare it true and disrupt actual discussion.
(July 24, 2017 at 11:36 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:(July 24, 2017 at 11:33 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Ah, the "prophecy" excuse.Yup right on time
#1 on the apologist hit parade.
Yup just as I predicted only i'll admit his points this time are more unhinged then I expected
Actually wasn't even going to post, until you called me out and started speaking for me. But you probably won't believe me, no matter what I say. You'll just make up a story, declare it true and disrupt actual discussion.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
