(July 26, 2017 at 5:30 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(July 26, 2017 at 4:24 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote: I once said of Jose Mourinho that he has three tactics to win a soccer match, viz a) cheat, b) cheat some more, and when a) & b) don't work c) accuse others of cheating. You, my dear turd are the Jose Mouinho of christian apologetics, you a) make up stories, b) make up some more stories, and when nobody believes you, c) you throw your nappies out of the pram and accuse everybody else of making things up.
I would challenge you to support any of this. Or have we regressed further from the 12 year old's argument of swearing and name calling, to the 3 year old's argument where you just parrot back and say "I know you are... but what am I"
Also keep in mind the context that you left out of the quote: I had said prior to what you quoted "Actually wasn't even going to post, until you called me out and started speaking for me". In retrospect, it may not of been clear, that I intended the last part to also fall under the probably or if condition.
And here we are... you still focusing on me, appear to be following my prediction, and avoiding the ideas and discussion.
Proof positive of projecting one's own faults onto others...typical. A person could make a fortune publishing a book about everything that's wrong with your mental processes.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.