RE: Plagiarism in the NT
July 28, 2017 at 1:35 pm
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2017 at 1:36 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(July 28, 2017 at 10:40 am)Astonished Wrote: Oh, go jump up your own ass, you judgmental piece of fucking shit. Who the goddamn fuck are you, threatening me with eternal hellfire, you bastard? You think you're better than me, motherfucker? Shut the fuck up about being respectful, cocksucker, you're such a dipshit hypocrite you don't even fucking understand what you just did, punk.
Your false equivalencies here (not that I'm surprised you've utterly failed to come up with anything better) just further hammer home your own ignorance and incapability. You've been fed a script and you can't deviate from it because you have no actual good arguments or reasons. You honestly don't think every argument ever presented hasn't been debunked or dismissed for ages? You're done. Go back to the little kids' table.
Some theistic demonstrations have been abandoned (Anselm's ontological), some are questionable (design, fine-tuning), some remain valid (Aquinas's 5W), and some newer version have been challenged but remain largely untested (Godel's ontological, Plantinga's modal). You can at least admit that some atheistic objections have been shown fallacious (Problem of Evil), inane (one-less-god, who-created-god) or highly problematic (historical skepticism, scientism).
Your absolute certainty, black and white thinking, abusive tone, and insults do not help your cause. I suggest you talk with a close friend or trusted adviser about why you respond so strongly to ideas with which you disagree.
