Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 15, 2025, 10:11 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supposed Int design proof
#12
RE: Supposed Int design proof
But if there's no way to even be remotely certain, why even discuss it? It's a pointless proposition. Doesn't really have any bearing on anything important anyway other than a desperate bid for evidence on the part of creationists. You'd think faith would be enough for them, right? Shame on them for demanding evidence from their lord!
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?

---

There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 5:20 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Silver - July 28, 2017 at 5:27 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by vorlon13 - July 28, 2017 at 5:29 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 28, 2017 at 5:37 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 28, 2017 at 5:32 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - July 28, 2017 at 5:36 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 9:30 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Jesster - July 28, 2017 at 9:38 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 29, 2017 at 9:36 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 29, 2017 at 10:11 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Rhondazvous - July 31, 2017 at 6:43 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 28, 2017 at 9:33 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by brewer - July 28, 2017 at 9:39 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 10:57 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 28, 2017 at 11:08 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 1:12 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Jesster - July 29, 2017 at 1:14 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 1:34 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 29, 2017 at 1:18 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astreja - July 29, 2017 at 1:54 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 2:07 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astreja - July 30, 2017 at 12:35 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 30, 2017 at 2:26 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by The Grand Nudger - July 29, 2017 at 9:00 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 9:18 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 2:22 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Minimalist - July 29, 2017 at 2:35 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)