Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 16, 2025, 12:22 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supposed Int design proof
#16
RE: Supposed Int design proof
(July 29, 2017 at 1:14 am)Jesster Wrote:
(July 29, 2017 at 1:12 am)Alex K Wrote: Wait, isn't the "axis of evil" merely about alignment in a particular direction? I don't think it says anything about our position in the universe.

So a deliberate misinterpretation, then.

Well, ..., on wikipedia, there's this puzzling quote by L. Krauss,

The Krauss Wrote:There's no way there should be a correlation of structure with our motion of the earth around the sun — the plane of the earth around the sun — the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe

I don't know where he gets that from (why would our solar system pointing in the direction of something mean that we are at the center of something we don't even know of whether it is finite?) but my suspicion is that he uses the phrase not literally to refer to a position in space but as a metaphor for "special". One should ask him what he meant. Maybe I'll write him.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 5:20 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Silver - July 28, 2017 at 5:27 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by vorlon13 - July 28, 2017 at 5:29 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 28, 2017 at 5:37 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 28, 2017 at 5:32 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - July 28, 2017 at 5:36 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 9:30 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Jesster - July 28, 2017 at 9:38 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Brian37 - July 29, 2017 at 9:36 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 29, 2017 at 10:11 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Rhondazvous - July 31, 2017 at 6:43 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 28, 2017 at 9:33 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by brewer - July 28, 2017 at 9:39 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Hammok Man - July 28, 2017 at 10:57 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 28, 2017 at 11:08 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 1:12 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Jesster - July 29, 2017 at 1:14 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 1:34 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astonished - July 29, 2017 at 1:18 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astreja - July 29, 2017 at 1:54 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 2:07 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Astreja - July 30, 2017 at 12:35 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 30, 2017 at 2:26 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by The Grand Nudger - July 29, 2017 at 9:00 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 9:18 am
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Alex K - July 29, 2017 at 2:22 pm
RE: Supposed Int design proof - by Minimalist - July 29, 2017 at 2:35 pm



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)