(August 1, 2017 at 8:00 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I notice that you attack and try to discredit the source, rather than the information. You actually said nothing about any of his arguments or facts in this regard. You are going to have to do a lot better than that.Considering your entire argument is based on asserted authority and no actual evidence, you're not giving us much choice, but if someone has an agenda to push and good reason to lie, or comes from a time when ignorance was rife and communication was at its lowest, then fuck yes, we'll question the validity of the source, you fucking moron, what the fuck is so hard to grasp about that?
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
