(August 1, 2017 at 11:09 am)Astonished Wrote:(August 1, 2017 at 8:00 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I notice that you attack and try to discredit the source, rather than the information. You actually said nothing about any of his arguments or facts in this regard. You are going to have to do a lot better than that.Considering your entire argument is based on asserted authority and no actual evidence, you're not giving us much choice, but if someone has an agenda to push and good reason to lie, or comes from a time when ignorance was rife and communication was at its lowest, then fuck yes, we'll question the validity of the source, you fucking moron, what the fuck is so hard to grasp about that?
I'm curious.... did you even read the article that was posted? And no, I'm not saying that it must be accepted, because of authority. I encourage you to check things out for yourself.
Here is a reference to what you are replying to, just in case your interested.
(July 31, 2017 at 11:10 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther