(August 6, 2017 at 9:41 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(August 4, 2017 at 8:37 pm)Astonished Wrote: Did he happen to say why or what about it was trash? Otherwise it just sounds like the kind of bias that proves the point Dawkins was making.
No bias. He started reading it specifically because he was being open minded and objective, and wanted to see things from the "other side's" perspective. So he asked one of his atheist friends for a recommendation and that was it. Don't remember specifically what turned him off to it, as it was several years ago now. I'll have to ask.
Thank you. I'd sure like an outsider's perspective on objective facts.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
